After carefully reviewing the content on the regulation of cryptoassets in Bolivia, it is evident that it is a topic of great relevance and complexity. The presentation of the two bills in the Plurinational Legislative Assembly of Bolivia marks a milestone in the discussion on the comprehensive adoption of cryptoassets in the country. It is encouraging to see the active participation of different actors, from politicians to fintech experts, in this process.
Crypto assets :
Defined by the Central Bank of Bolivia as digital units issued by private agents in an electronic and decentralized manner, they have been prohibited in the country since 2014. However, two bills have recently been presented for their regulation, indicating a significant change. in the official stance towards this emerging technology.
The first project , supported by the Movement towards Socialism (MAS), proposes the creation of a Fiscal Control Institution for Cryptoassets and Fintech. On the other hand, the second project, prepared by lawyer Fabian Espinoza and supported by deputy Mariela Baldivieso of Comunidad Ciudadana and the "Crypto and Blockchain Communities", seeks a comprehensive adoption of crypto assets in the country.
The Socialization Conversation of the Bill for the comprehensive adoption of Cryptoassets , organized by the InternetBolivia.org Foundation and the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES), brought together a variety of experts, economists and activists to discuss the details and implications of this legislative proposal. During the event, several points of contention and concern were highlighted.
On the one hand, some experts argued in favor of the need for comprehensive regulation to take advantage of the economic and technological benefits of cryptoassets. However, others expressed concern about the lack of priority in other legislative areas, such as data protection and fintech regulations, which could have a more immediate and significant impact on the country.
In addition, various criticisms and observations were raised about the bills presented. The omission of the Central Bank of Bolivia in the preparation of the proposals was questioned, as well as the lack of technical-scientific support and the ambiguity in certain key aspects of the regulation.
Fabian Espinoza, one of the main promoters of the bill for the comprehensive adoption of cryptoassets in Bolivia, shared his perspective during the conversation. He expressed that the reason behind this initiative lies in the need to establish adequate regulation for this emerging technology. According to Espinoza, after knocking on several doors for guidance and encountering negative responses, they realized that the absence of official regulation was hindering progress in this area. If there were no explicit ban, it is likely that Bolivia would already be taking advantage of the opportunities offered by cryptoassets.
Daniel Agramont, another prominent participant at the event, shared his reflections on the relationship between the private sector and the State in the context of the digital economy. Since 2014, Agramont has observed the evolution of issues related to the digital economy and the initial perception that the State was not necessary in this area. However, over time, various issues arose that required the intervention and participation of the State. Agramont emphasized the importance of opening new expectations and collaborating between the private sector and the government to promote the development and proper regulation of cryptoasset technology.
Through these interventions, the need for a collaborative and proactive approach between the public and private sectors is highlighted to address the challenges and opportunities associated with the adoption of cryptoassets in Bolivia. The active participation of people like Fabian Espinoza and Daniel Agramont demonstrates the interest and determination of Bolivian society in finding innovative and effective solutions to regulate this emerging technology.
In conclusion :
While it is encouraging to see progress in the discussion on the regulation of cryptoassets in Bolivia, it is clear that this is a complex issue that requires a careful and balanced approach. It is essential to find a middle ground between promoting innovation and protecting the interests of the country and its citizens. The discussion must continue to be inclusive and based on up-to-date scientific evidence to ensure that any future legislation is effective and beneficial for all involved.
תגובות